Search Engines Now Self Optimizing To Find The Truth Faster
Late on August 28, 2024, less than 36 hours ago, we posted the story "Learning It Is Not Paranoia If They Really Are Watching You - HomeEquity Bank", and last night, it was scanned and indexed by the Bing search engine. As can be seen in the image below, Google got there yesterday, just a few short hours after the post.
We were happy with the four-day turnaround on indexing of our stories, and this is truly outstanding.
We have not done anything to improve the speed of the visits and indexing. We do know that others, both in the mortgage industry and consumer advocates, are now frequently sharing our content on social media, which we can only guess is helping. At least one of those mortgage professionals is sharing much of what we post within an industry related group on Facebook, where it is seen by hundreds or thousands of industry insiders, who may also be sharing to their clients.
As time passes, our credibility increases while that of the brokers, branders, and bankers declines.
Libelous and defamatory claims like those known to have been made to a potential client by David Flude, in which he claimed our philanthropic producer is 'a repeat serial agitator' who was 'trying to promote his own business' are just not being believed anymore.
As was noted by that client "You truly must think people are stupid, and your explanation is insulting."
That might have worked for the loan sharking brokers of Verico the Mortgage Station and their collaborators at Verico Financial Group Inc. and HomeEquity Bank had they been able to silence this story through threatened legal action. However, that turned out to be nothing but huff, puff, and bluff, as none of the multi-million and multi-billion-dollar corporations have filed any civil action for damages regarding unsubstantiated claims of 'libel' nor sought injunctive relief to stop our publication of the truth about their criminal and ethical breaches of trust. The more than eight-month-old threat, that was sent to us anonymously, was so vacuous as to not even warrant the services of a lawyer to write it. Alternatively, they could have taken us up on our offer of an on-camera interview through which they could disprove our claims using their own countermanding evidence, if they have any.
Instead, they all chose to wallow in denial rather than step up to defend their 'good' names.
Now their colleagues and competitors, and most importantly their potential clients, are learning in ever increasing numbers the truth through our reports and videos and they simply do not believe that multi-million and multi-billion-dollar corporations that claim they have done no harm would choose to huddle together for more than two years in a dark corner to hide from the allegations of a small, not-for-profit, social enterprise, community media service that donates it services to any charity, not-for-profit, or benevolent community group that asks, unless those claims are fully supported.
On one side, you have philanthropists making public allegations against multi-million and multi-billion-dollar corporations while calling for the evidence to be reviewed in a court of law, and on the other you have crickets.